R 125. Pentafluoroethane is a fluorocarbon with the formula CF 3 CHF 2 Pentafluoroethane is currently used as a refrigerant (known as R125) and also used as a fire suppression agent in fire suppression systems Pentafluoroethane does not deplete ozone so it has replaced earlier fluorinated chemicals that did Boiling point −485 °C (−553 °F 2247 K)Melting point −1030 °C (−1534 °F 1702 K)Chemical formula C₂HF₅Molar mass 12002 g/mol.
Reflecting its GSXR heritage the GSXR125 features vertically stacked LED headlights with the low beam above the high beam and position lights on each side of the headlight The GSXR125’s LED headlights are bright and compact lighter and longer lasting compared to conventional halogenbulb headlights seen on competing machines.
R125 Refrigerant Info & Fact Sheet Refrigerant HQ
R125 (Pentafluoroethane) from China Inv No 701TA662 and 731TA1554 Preliminary Phase Contacts Office of Investigations Name/Email Phone Investigator Andres Andrade Document TypeDocument TitleFile TypeNotices USITCInstitutionNotices USITCDetermination PreliminaryNotices USITCConference LetterQuestionnairesUS Producers' Questionnaire.
R125 (Pentafluoroethane) from China USITC
The PetitionPeriod of InvestigationScope of The InvestigationComments on The Scope of The InvestigationFiling RequirementsComments on Product CharacteristicsDetermination of Industry Support For The PetitionAllegations and Evidence of Material Injury and CausationAllegations of Sales at LTFVUS PriceOn January 12 2021 the US Department of Commerce (Commerce) received an antidumping duty (AD) petition concerning imports of pentafluoroethane (R125) from the People's Republic of China (China) filed in proper form on behalf of Honeywell International Inc (the petitioner) the sole domestic producer of R125[1] The Petition was accompanied by a countervailing duty (CVD) petition Start Printed Page 8584concerning imports of R125 from China[2] On January 14 22 and 27 2021 Commerce requested supplemental information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petition in separate supplemental questionnaires and a phone call with the petitioner[3] On January 19 25 and 28 2021 the petitioner filed timely responses to these requests for additional information[4] In accordance with section 732(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (the Act) the petitioner alleges that imports of R125 from China are being or are likely to be sold in the United States at less than fair va Because China is a nonmarket economy (NME) country pursuant to 19 CFR 351204(b)(1) the period of investigation (POI) is July 1 2020 through December 31 2020 The product covered by this investigation is R125 from China For a full description of the scope of this investigation seethe appendix to this notice On January 14 22 and 27 2021 Commerce requested further information from the petitioner regarding the proposed scope to ensure that the scope language in the Petition is an accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is seeking relief[6] On January 19 and 28 2021 the petitioner revised the scope[7] The description of the merchandise covered by this investigation as described in the appendix to this notice reflects these clarifications As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations we are setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (ie scope)[8] Commerce will consider all comments received from interested parties and if necessary will consult with interested parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary determinations If scope comments include factual information all such factual information should be limited to public information[9] To facilitate preparation of its questionnaires Co All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's (E&C's) Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) unless an exception applies[12] An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due Commerce is providing interested parties an opportunity to comment on the appropriate physical characteristics of R125 to be reported in response to Commerce's AD questionnaires This information will be used to identify the key physical characteristics of the subject merchandise in order to report the relevant factors of production (FOPs) accurately as well as to develop appropriate productcomparison criteria Interested parties may provide any information or comments that they feel are relevant to the development of an accurate list of physical characteristics In order to consider the suggestions of interested parties in developing and issuing the AD questionnaires all product characteristics comments must be filed by 500 pm ET on February 22 2021 which is the next business day after 20 calendar days from the signature date of this notice[13] Any Start Printed Page 8585rebuttal comments which may include factual information must be filed by 500 pm ET on March 4 20 Section 732(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on behalf of the domestic industry Section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic producers or workers who support the petition account for (i) At least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product and (ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for or opposition to the petition Moreover section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act provides that if the petition does not establish support of domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of the total production of the domestic like product Commerce shall (i) Poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if there is support for the petition as required by subparagraph (A) or (ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling method to poll the “industry” Secti The petitioner alleges that the US industry producing the domestic like product is being materially injured or is threatened with material injury by reason of the imports of the subject merchandise sold at LTFV In addition the petitioner alleges that subject imports exceed the negligibility threshold provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act[25] The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is illustrated by a significant and increasing volume of subject imports reduced market share underselling and price depression and suppression lost sales and revenues decline in employment variables declining profitability adverse impact on capital expenditures and capacity utilization and the magnitude of the alleged dumping margins[26] We assessed the allegations and supporting evidence regarding material injury threat of Start Printed Page 8586material injury causation as well as negligibility and we have determined that these allegations are properly The following is a description of the allegations of sales at LTFV upon which Commerce based its decision to initiate the AD investigation of imports of R125 from China The sources of data for the deductions and adjustments relating to US price and normal value (NV) are discussed in greater detail in the AD Initiation Checklist The petitioner based export price (EP) on two methodologies (1) Information from a sale of R125 produced in and exported from China by a Chinese producer and (2) transactionspecific average unit values (AUVs) derived from publiclyavailable import data and tied to ship manifest data obtained from ImportGenius and Datamyne[28] The petitioner made adjustment for movement and other expenses where appropriate[29].
Pentafluoroethane Wikipedia
R125 is one of the most common refrigerants across the world yet so many people have never heard of it While it is rare to find a direct R125 refrigerant application it is very common to find some of the blended refrigerants that R125 contributes to Name Scientific PentafluoroethaneName (3) HFC125Name (2) Freon™ 125Name (4) Genetron HFC 125.
2019 2021 Yamaha Yzf R125
Global Suzuki GSXR125 MOTORCYCLE
Federal Register :: the People Pentafluoroethane (R125) From
Federal Register :: Pentafluoroethane (R125) From the People
BackgroundScope of The InvestigationScope CommentsAnalysis of Comments ReceivedVerificationChanges Since The Preliminary DeterminationFinal Affirmative Determination of Critical CircumstancesChinawide Entity and The Use of Adverse Facts AvailableSeparate RatesCombination RatesOn August 17 2021 Commerce published the Preliminary Determination of sales at LTFV of R125 from China[1] The petitioner in this investigation is Honeywell International Inc The mandatory respondents in this investigation are Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind Co Ltd (Sanmei) and Zhejiang Quzhou Juxin Fluorine Chemical Co Ltd (Juxin) A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Determination as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by the parties for this final determination are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum[2] The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) ACCESS is available to registered users at http//accesstradegov In addition a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https//accesstradegov/public/FRNoti The product covered by this investigation is R125 from China For a complete description of the scope of this investigation seeAppendix I In accordance with the preamble to Commerce's regulations[3] the Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage ( ie scope)[4] Certain interested parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice We addressed these comments in the Preliminary Determination and preliminarily modified the scope of this and the companion countervailing duty (CVD) investigation[5] We established a period of time for parties to address scope issues in scope case and rebuttal briefs[6] and we received such comments which we addressed in the Final Scope Decision Memorandum[7] After analyzing interested parties' comments we made certain changes to the scope of this and the concurrent CVD investigation that published in the Preliminary Determination SeeAppendix I to this notice All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix II Start Printed Page 1118 Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information relied upon in making its final determination in this investigation However we took additional steps in lieu of an onsite verification to verify the information relied upon in making this final determination in accordance with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (the Act)[8] Based on our review and analysis of the comments received from parties we made certain changes to the AD margin calculation for Sanmei[9] We continue to find that critical circumstances exist for imports of R125 from China for the nonselected companies receiving a separate rate and the Chinawide entity pursuant to sections 735(a)(3)(A) and (B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351206[10] For the reasons explained in the Preliminary Determination we continue to find that the use of adverse facts available (AFA) pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act is warranted in determining the rate for the Chinawide entity[11] In selecting the AFA rate for the Chinawide entity Commerce's practice is to select a rate that is sufficiently adverse to ensure that the uncooperative party does not obtain a more favorable result by failing to cooperate than if it had fully cooperated[12] As AFA we assigned the Chinawide entity a dumping margin of 27805 percent which is the highest transactionspecific rate calculated for Sanmei for the final determination[13] Because this constitutes primary information calculated in the normal course of the investigation the statutory corroboration requirement in section 776(c) of the Act does not apply For the final determination we continue to find that Sanmei and certain nonindividually examined respondents are eligible for separate rates Generally Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act which provides instructions for calculating the allothers rate in an investigation for guidance when calculating the rate for separate rate respondents that we did not individually examine Because the only individually calculated dumping margin for Sanmei is not zero de minimisor based entirely on facts otherwise available the estimated weightedaverage dumping margin calculated for Sanmei is the margin assigned to all other nonindividuallyexamined separate rate recipients pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act In the Initiation Notice[14] Commerce stated that it would calculate producer/exporter combination rates for the respondents that are eligible for a separate rate in this investigation For a list of the respondents that established eligibility for their own separate rates and the exporter/producer combination rates applicable to these respondents seeAppendix III.